Chapitrage:
0:00 Introduction
0:59 1.1 - Kramnik's motivations behind the investigations
5:06 1.2 - MVL adding context
6:39 1.3 - How Kramnik came to investigate on cheaters
11:20 2.1 - Kramnik's methodology
14:00 2.2 - Relying on the diversity of factors
16:37 3.1 - 2D vs 3D chess influence on level?
19:14 3.2 - Chess.com using OTB results?
21:31 3.3 - About irrelevant parameters
24:37 4.1 - Ideal threshold to trigger bans?
29:58 4.2 - MVL's counter-argument
34:53 4.3 - Kramnik about over-performance
37:09 5.1 - Intermediate sanctions for delicate cases?
39:46 5.2 - Chess.com's responsibility dilemma
41:05 5.3 - Targeting the culprit in a suspicious group
43:34 5.4 - Theoretical example with a 2200 FIDE player over-performing
49:30 6.1 - Kramnik's most SHOCKING discoveries on Titled Tuesday
54:33 6.2 - MVL's analysis on example #1
58:52 6.3 - Example #2 (2260 FIDE)
1:00:15 6.4 - Example #3 (2450 FIDE)
1:01:05 6.5 - Example #4 (2150 FIDE)
1:01:42 6.6 - Example #5 (2560 FIDE grandmaster)
1:03:29 6.7 - Better performance than Magnus and Hikaru?!
1:06:58 6.8 - Kramnik and MVL arguing about Chess.com's responsibility
1:11:00 6.9 - Kramnik's epic roast on Kevin
1:12:30 6.10 - Maxime's performance : natural?
1:14:18 6.11 - Benchmark of the top players
1:15:10 6.12 - Kramnik's conclusion on the stats
1:15:54 6.13 - MVL's conclusion
1:16:33 7.1 - About "second chance" accounts
1:20:46 7.2 - Legal actions and prize refunding
1:24:13 7.3 - The biggest victims of cheating
1:26:37 7.4 - Immediate reaction needed
1:27:37 7.5 - Post-COVID improvement?
1:29:55 8.1 - POLL : are people convinced?
1:30:30 8.2 - OTB situation still under control?
1:32:42 8.3 - Cheating among children
1:34:13 8.4 - Big cheating drama in Uzbekistan
1:36:10 9.1 - Resuming the situation
1:37:22 9.2 - Still possible to discuss with Chess.com?
1:39:23 9.3 - An optimistic note
1:40:44 9.4 - MVL reveals his Titled Tuesday "anomaly"
1:41:56 Last words