Civil Procedure: Supplemental Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1367)
Studicata Studicata
44.1K subscribers
7,762 views
0

 Published On Nov 6, 2023

📄 FREE CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE

Download here: link coming soon.


📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP

Law school prep: https://studicata.com/law-school
Bar exam prep: https://studicata.com/bar-exam
Free courses: https://studicata.com/free-courses


❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS

Community: https://studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: https://studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: https://shoutout.studicata.com


📱 TECH

iOS app: https://studicata.com/ios
Android app: https://studicata.com/android


📣 ABOUT

Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more—Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.

Email: [email protected]

Learn more: https://studicata.com


🎬 VIDEO INFO

Civil Procedure: Civil Procedure: Supplemental Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1367)

00:00 Introduction
00:15 Requirements for a Court to Hear and Decide a Case
00:41 How a Federal Court Obtains Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
02:01 Supplemental Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1367
09:00 3-Step Approach (§ 1367(a)-(c))
10:22 Step 1: § 1367(a) — Qualifying for Supplemental Jurisdiction
11:40 "Common Nucleus of Operative Fact" Test
13:58 Practice Problem 1.0
20:32 Practice Problem 2.0
26:21 "Same Transaction or Occurrence" Test
31:12 Practice Problem 3.0
44:18 Step 2: § 1367(b) — Legislative Intent
45:35 Understanding the Purpose of § 1367(b)
53:03 Step 2: § 1367(b) — Disqualifications
58:19 Practice Problem 4.0
1:04:40 Step 3: § 1367(c) — Discretionary Factors
1:12:40 Practice Problem 5.0
1:21:40 Conclusion


Primary sources of law for this video:

28 U.S.C. § 1367.
Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725 (1966).
Polaris Pool Systems v. Letro Products, Inc., 161 F.R.D. 422, 425 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
Plant v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc., 598 F.2d 1357, 1361 (5th Cir. 1979).
Revere Copper Brass v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 426 F.2d 709, 715 (5th Cir. 1970).
Ambromovage v. United Mine Workers of America, 726 F.2d 972, 990 (3d Cir. 1984).
Enochs v. Lampasas County, 641 F.3d 155 (5th Cir. 2011).
Viacom International v. Kearney, 212 F.3d 721, 727 (2d Cir. 2000).


Learn more: https://studicata.com

show more

Share/Embed