Application of Existics Equations to Superluminal Neutrino Data appears to account for anomalous behavior.

Gavin Wince covers the final results concerning the neutrino time-of-flight data in fine detail, applying the Existics equations to the neutrino time-of-flight data in comparison with the speed of light. It becomes apparent that the extra aspect of relative frames of reference missing from Relativity and found in Existics can account for WHY the neutrino appears to be both slightly superluminal and slightly subliminal; simultaneously, depending on how it is measured.

"The essential achievement of Existics, namely, replacing the Newtonian inertial frame of reference with a more Leibnizian model of reference frames and applying it to Relativity, is to over-come the rigidity of one-dimensional time using three dimensions of time; this being a directly relevant element to be added to the displacement field." -Gavin Wince, July 28, 2012.

According to the official conclusion (arXiv:1109.4897v4; 12, Jul2012):

"[The] corresponding relative difference [between] the muon neutrino velocity and the speed of light [is as follows]:"

(v − c)/c = 2.7 ± 3.1 (stat.) × 10−6

"Of [the] Target Tracker (TT) and Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC) [timer] events retained, a value measured from the average TT and RPC distribution is in agreement with the value obtained with the main analysis."

Main Analysis- (6.5 ± 7.4) ns

Target Tracker- (−1.9 ± 3.7) ns
Resistive Plate Chamber- (−0.8 ± 3.5) ns

Therefore the official conclusion regarding the conventional interpretation of the data is:

"[The] neutrino arrival time [is] compatible within errors to the one computed by assuming the speed of light in vacuum." --pg. 30

"Of [the new measured] events retained, the average distribution is in agreement with the value obtained with the main analysis." --pg.30


However, the conclusion reached using the Existics equations is:

The modern concept of inertial frames needs a slight modification incorporating three-dimensions of time into the conventional model. When studying physical phenomena at the limits of conventional scientific knowledge and theory specific problems begin to arise such as unexpected asymmetries, surprising discoveries, and missing data. Rather than using statistical "margins of error" to blanket these anomalies, three dimensions of time allows for extra coordinates to be used without modifying the existing degrees of freedom already associated with three dimensional space and other physical perimeters.